Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[QUESTION] #841

Closed
xxcka opened this issue Oct 14, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

[QUESTION] #841

xxcka opened this issue Oct 14, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working fixed question Further information is requested
Milestone

Comments

@xxcka
Copy link

xxcka commented Oct 14, 2022

使用com.alibaba.fastjson2.JSON#writeTo(java.io.OutputStream, java.lang.Object, com.alibaba.fastjson2.JSONWriter.Feature...)序列化大对象(数组,200M)时会出现OutOfMemoryError,查看是因为MAX_ARRAY_SIZE限制为64M。请问为什么是限制64M呢,可以修改这个值吗?

@xxcka xxcka added the question Further information is requested label Oct 14, 2022
@wenshao wenshao added this to the 2.0.16 milestone Oct 14, 2022
@wenshao wenshao added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 14, 2022
@wenshao
Copy link
Member

wenshao commented Oct 15, 2022

https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/com/alibaba/fastjson2/fastjson2/2.0.16-SNAPSHOT/
新增加一个JSONWriter.Feature.LargeObject,启用后就可以写大于512M的对象,请帮忙用2.0.16-SNAPSHOT帮忙验证,2.0.16版本预计在10月30日前发布

@wenshao wenshao added the fixed label Oct 15, 2022
@wenshao
Copy link
Member

wenshao commented Oct 15, 2022

限制64M是为了有一些循环引用的场景导致内存占用过大的保护措施

@xxcka
Copy link
Author

xxcka commented Oct 20, 2022

2.0.16-SNAPSHOT使用JSONWriter.Feature.LargeObject写大于200M的对象没问题。感谢!

@xxcka xxcka closed this as completed Oct 20, 2022
@wenshao
Copy link
Member

wenshao commented Oct 22, 2022

https://github.com/alibaba/fastjson2/releases/tag/2.0.16
问题已修复,请用2.0.16版本

@lizu18xz
Copy link

lizu18xz commented Nov 7, 2024

dubbo中怎么配置这个参数 JSONWriter.Feature.LargeObject

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working fixed question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants