You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to the source code of class IntentAccuracyDailyDialog(BaseMetric), the intent likelihood of utterances on DailyDialog is computed by rajkumarrrk/roberta-daily-dialog-intent-classifier.
However, according to the config.json of this classifier, it is used for emotion classification, with four labels: joy, optimism, anger, and sadness, while the intent labels on DailyDialog should be Inform, Questions, Directives, and Commissive instead.
So my question is: Is this classifier already fine-tuned on intent classification of DailyDialog utterances?
Empirically, i obeserve that the classification results of ground truth utterances in DailyDialog by this classifier are unbalanced and not well-aligned to the labelled intent distribution, as shown below.
classification results on test set
label-0
label-1
label-2
label-3
Intent Accuracy
classification on ground truth
0.7102
0.0055
0.0275
0.2071
0.6147
intent labels in DailyDialog
0.4988
0.2231
0.1565
0.1213
-
classification on SFT generation
0.5363
0.1591
0.0944
0.2100
0.4034
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
According to the source code of class IntentAccuracyDailyDialog(BaseMetric), the intent likelihood of utterances on DailyDialog is computed by
rajkumarrrk/roberta-daily-dialog-intent-classifier
.However, according to the
config.json
of this classifier, it is used for emotion classification, with four labels: joy, optimism, anger, and sadness, while the intent labels on DailyDialog should be Inform, Questions, Directives, and Commissive instead.So my question is: Is this classifier already fine-tuned on intent classification of DailyDialog utterances?
Empirically, i obeserve that the classification results of ground truth utterances in DailyDialog by this classifier are unbalanced and not well-aligned to the labelled intent distribution, as shown below.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: