Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
If the tlsvnc scheme is publicly documented somewhere, it's possible that someone might implement it given sufficient motivation. If you want to use RealVNC viewer, I'd recommend using RSA-AES, which is implemented by both. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
-
Hello everybody. I am playing around with neatvnc and it appears to me that when it is compiled with TLS support the "vencrypt" scheme only is supported.
This fact restrict the number of clients which can be used (on Windows now I can only find TigerVNC, and maybe, TightVNC) but for example RealVNC can't be used since it supports "tlsvnc" only (and not "vencrypt").
Do you agree with that? Or is there something I am completely missing?
If you agree, is there any chance to see "tlsvnc" implemented in the future?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions