-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 534
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
feat: Add start-after
support for list
#2063
Comments
Hi @Xuanwo , I am willing to help on this. |
Great! Have fun! I will assign you to the first task. |
Hi @Xuanwo, I am willing to help the rest of 2 tasks. |
Great! Maybe we can add a behavior test case for start after first🤩 |
Thank you! |
I have assigned this issue to you, take your time and have fun! |
Hi, @Xuanwo , need help with the details about behavior test before coding. Here is what the structure of the behavior test for // in file tests/behavior/list.rs
pub async fn test_list_with_start_after(op: Operator) -> Result<()> {
// 1. check the capability
// 2. write test data
// 3. list with start-after
// 4. assert the result
// 5. clear data
}
|
LGTM!
It's Ok to implement for s3 first. |
Great, your quick response is appreciated. |
All sub-tasks finished, this issue could be closed as well. |
Thanks a lot! |
Some services support list from
start-after
, likes3
,gcs
. We can provide this feature to allow users to resume their list process.Tasks
start-after
forOpList
and add into capability #2069 @lexcaostart-after
support for s3start-after
support for gcsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: