Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Does archaic -мак verb form accept additional affixes #36

Open
mansayk opened this issue Feb 18, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Does archaic -мак verb form accept additional affixes #36

mansayk opened this issue Feb 18, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request lexc twol

Comments

@mansayk
Copy link
Member

mansayk commented Feb 18, 2019

We have this statement in lxc:

%<ger1%>:%>м%{A%}%{K%} GER-INFL ;

For example:

Бармак, килмәк. 

I cannot remember it taking additional affixes, like case or possession:

килмәге, килмәгрәк, килмәктер, шикләнмәге, шаярмагы, бозылмагын

These word forms are (were) not possible, I think.

So, maybe we can also change it as:

%<ger1%>:%>м%{A%}к GER-INFL ;

and make some more restrictions, right?

Am I correct here?

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request lexc twol
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants