We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
We should bring in the spec response, FWHM response function tools into rrtm
library(PEcAnRTM) data(sensor.rsr) refl <- PEcAnRTM::spectral.response(as.vector(rrtm::prospect5(mod.params[i,"N.mu"],mod.params[i,"Cab.mu"], mod.params[i,"Car.mu"], mod.params[i,"Cbrown.mu"],mod.params[i,"Cw.mu"], mod.params[i,"Cm.mu"])$reflectance), 'licor')
Would like to remove the depends on PEcAn RTM.
this is probably not to challenging to move from RTM to rrtm
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@ashiklom I just created a new branch that added rsr based on the pecan rtm implementation. Will make a PR now
> refl <- rrtm::spectral.response(as.vector(rrtm::prospect5(1.38,41,9,0.06,0.00560,0.002)$reflectance), 'licor') > trans <- rrtm::spectral.response(as.vector(rrtm::prospect5(1.38,41,9,0.06,0.00560,0.002)$transmittance), 'licor') > 1-trans-refl [1] 0.9511892 0.9066594 0.1452508
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
We should bring in the spec response, FWHM response function tools into rrtm
Would like to remove the depends on PEcAn RTM.
this is probably not to challenging to move from RTM to rrtm
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: