Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: add basic support for XML schema format in messages for v3.0.0 spec #214

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: add basic support for XML schema format in messages for v3.0.0 spec #214

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+242 −0

Conversation

yogeshnikam671
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • Adds support for XML/XSD-based schemas in the AsyncAPI specification using MultiFormatSchema.
  • Currently, basic support is provided, allowing schemas to be defined either as an inline string or referenced from an external file using $ref.
  • This support is implemented exclusively for the v3.0.0 specification.
  • With this enhancement, users can define schemas in XML format using either inline content or an external reference.

@yogeshnikam671 yogeshnikam671 changed the title Add basic support for XML schema format in messages for v3.0.0 spec feat: add basic support for XML schema format in messages for v3.0.0 spec Feb 25, 2025
@Pakisan Pakisan self-assigned this Feb 27, 2025
@Pakisan Pakisan mentioned this pull request Feb 27, 2025
Open
@Pakisan
Copy link
Member

Pakisan commented Feb 27, 2025

@yogeshnikam671 looks good for me

It can be merged, but resulted specification will not be compliant with our Schema

Let's wait for asyncapi/spec-json-schemas#569

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Reviewers

@Pakisan Pakisan Awaiting requested review from Pakisan Pakisan is a code owner

@asyncapi-bot-eve asyncapi-bot-eve Awaiting requested review from asyncapi-bot-eve asyncapi-bot-eve is a code owner

@harikrishnan83 harikrishnan83 Awaiting requested review from harikrishnan83 harikrishnan83 is a code owner

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@Pakisan Pakisan

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@yogeshnikam671 @Pakisan