Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Survey Question on the For loop in source file 02_capi_graph/src/algorithms/capi/betweennessCentrality.c line 158 #1

Open
LChenGit opened this issue Jun 29, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@LChenGit
Copy link

Hello Sir/ Madam
We are from a research group at Iowa State University, USA. We want to do a survey on Github developers on the methods they used for paralleling their code. To do the survey, We want to ask three questions:

  1. Have you ever tried to add pragma for that 'for' loop?.

  2. How much confidence do you have about the correctness of this implementation? You can choose from 1-5 with 1 as the lowest confidence score and 5 as the highest confidence.

  3. (Optional) Do you actually run (interpret the code with compilation and pass input/get output) the code? Yes/No

  • If yes, can you provide the information of what are the input and expected output of this program (the input that caused the program to run through this for-loop).

The for loop is from line 158 of file https:/github.com/atmughrabi/AccelGraph/blob/master/02_capi_graph/src/algorithms/capi/betweennessCentrality.c
Here is a part of the code:

nan
for (i = 0; i < stats->num_vertices; i++)
{
free(stats->predecessors[i].nodes);
}

Sincerely thanks

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant