We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
@aws-crypto/crc32
Refs: https://github.com/trivikr/benchmark-crc32
Benchmarks in Node.js v16.4.0:
crc x 418,858 ops/sec ±0.33% (91 runs sampled) crc-32 x 426,337 ops/sec ±0.25% (96 runs sampled) buffer-crc32 x 318,404 ops/sec ±0.33% (94 runs sampled) @aws-crypto/crc32 x 74,763 ops/sec ±0.90% (95 runs sampled) Fastest is crc-32
Benchmarks in Firefox browser v78.10.1esr:
crc x 188,843 ops/sec ±0.48% (63 runs sampled) crc-32 x 370,060 ops/sec ±0.85% (67 runs sampled) buffer-crc32 x 80,874 ops/sec ±2.67% (64 runs sampled) @aws-crypto/crc32 x 15,069 ops/sec ±1.78% (64 runs sampled) Fastest is crc-32
The @aws-crypto/crc32 implementation to be at par or close to other CRC32 implementations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Is your request related to a problem? Please describe.
Refs: https://github.com/trivikr/benchmark-crc32
Benchmarks in Node.js v16.4.0:
Benchmarks in Firefox browser v78.10.1esr:
Describe the solution you'd like
The
@aws-crypto/crc32
implementation to be at par or close to other CRC32 implementations.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: