Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Determine effort needed #18548

Open
6 tasks
severinbeauvais opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 4 comments
Open
6 tasks

Determine effort needed #18548

severinbeauvais opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
ENTITY Business Team timeboxed

Comments

@severinbeauvais
Copy link
Collaborator

severinbeauvais commented Nov 14, 2023

From Linda:

Hi team, could you make sure you include a ticket into the next sprint to determine how much effort it would be to decouple the completing party from the incorprator/directors/etc.? So that we don't have to collect completing party address information?

What changes are needed for:

  • Create UI?
  • Edit UI?
  • Schema?
  • Legal API?
  • Outputs?
  • Emails?
@severinbeauvais severinbeauvais added the ENTITY Business Team label Nov 14, 2023
@severinbeauvais
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@yuisotozaki @janisrogers Does one of you have some updated designs? What should the Completing Party component look like, and where should it be -- review step?

@jdyck-fw
Copy link
Collaborator

Mihai will add more context here.

@severinbeauvais
Copy link
Collaborator Author

severinbeauvais commented Nov 15, 2023

Note that Completing Party is a shared component. In addition to updating it, the UIs that use it will need some updating. And there may be some UIs (or filings within a UI) that have their own Completing Party component.

It will require a quick look through the UI code to see how the filings are implemented and what needs to change.

@jdyck-fw
Copy link
Collaborator

@davemck513 - Tagging you here for visibilty.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
ENTITY Business Team timeboxed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants