You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Because the data labeling strategy according to the multi-head selection model, most of the relationship labels are "N", which leads to the model biasing the prediction of "N". How to solve such a problem?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Well this is not an issue in any of our examined datasets. We have examined four datasets in our work. I guess you use your own dataset. You can try to weight the examples to solve your imbalanced problem. Another solution might be to remove the N label completely from the model (i.e., you have to change the model for that). Basically, you get probabilities for each of the labels and when for every of the examined labels, you get a threshold below 0.5, you can infer that there is no relation. This is just an idea and I am not sure whether it will work in practice.
Because the data labeling strategy according to the multi-head selection model, most of the relationship labels are "N", which leads to the model biasing the prediction of "N". How to solve such a problem?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: