Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Some questions about best practices #106

Open
Dillon214 opened this issue Nov 1, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Some questions about best practices #106

Dillon214 opened this issue Nov 1, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@Dillon214
Copy link

Hello Tangram developers,

I'd like to ask a question that might help me clarify whether Tangram is a good choice for my large visium dataset.

So, it seems to me that Tangram works best when both the single cell RNA dataset and spatial dataset have the same cell types respresented in each. That is to say, that the single cell reference dataset ought to have all the same cell types you would expect in the visium dataset. Is this a hard rule? I have age and condition-matched visium and scRNA datasets, however the scRNA dataset I do have has been filtered to only contain cells of a single type. I wonder if I can still run Tangram to map these cells to the visium data, or whether this would be an invalid approach. I imagine the latter.

Any advice and guidance would be highly appreciated.

-Dillon

@gaddamshreya1
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @Dillon214, I wouldn't its a hard rule but an assumption that Tangram makes for best results. You can still try mapping your single cell data with only one cell type to the visium data. In your case, Tangram will do its best to map that single cell type over the visium spots, however, I think it would require some interpretation based on the biology of the tissue section.

Another way you can do this is to find single cell refernce datasets that are as close as possible to the visium data you have and continue mappaing with Tangram.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants