You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the user can set the upscale and downscale periods to overlap, which causes one to be preferred. We want to avoid this priority system.
Problem to solve
There needs to be a check that checks for overlapping timespans between the upscale periods and downscale periods.
Further details
Good Luck
Proposal
Add a check in the checkForIncompatibleFields method of the Layer type, that check for overlapping timespans between upscale and downscale periods.
The check should be able to check for incompatibilities between absolute timespans, relative timespans and between relative and absolute timespans.
It also needs to interpret different timezones, this could propose a bigger issue because of the weekday span on relative timespans.
Who can address the issue
Go Dev
Other links/references
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Issue
Currently the user can set the upscale and downscale periods to overlap, which causes one to be preferred. We want to avoid this priority system.
Problem to solve
There needs to be a check that checks for overlapping timespans between the upscale periods and downscale periods.
Further details
Good Luck
Proposal
Add a check in the checkForIncompatibleFields method of the Layer type, that check for overlapping timespans between upscale and downscale periods.
The check should be able to check for incompatibilities between absolute timespans, relative timespans and between relative and absolute timespans.
It also needs to interpret different timezones, this could propose a bigger issue because of the weekday span on relative timespans.
Who can address the issue
Go Dev
Other links/references
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: