You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The action "complete-task" is misleading. It sounds as if I could complete a single activated job. However, what is actually happening is that a worker is started which is waiting for jobs to get activated and then completing all of them.
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to have a name that is clear.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm supporting the intention of having clear names. When we talk about Zeebe then it would be more exact to call it "start-worker".
But I'm not sure about changing the name because the tool should be agnostic to the concrete BPMN engine. Another engine may call it differently. The name "complete-task" is more general. So, the concrete test runner can implement it in a proper way.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The action "complete-task" is misleading. It sounds as if I could complete a single activated job. However, what is actually happening is that a worker is started which is waiting for jobs to get activated and then completing all of them.
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to have a name that is clear.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: