You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed severe network penalty using the default network/tap setup instatiated for toolbox containers On a 10Gbit connection to a NAS with 20G of bandwidth available to the fabric I am seeing toolbox throughput top out at around 3.5Gbit/s
Rootful distrobox of the same container runs close to line/host kernel rate
Steps how to reproduce the behaviour
*Create a toolbox container using fedora:latest tag - install iperf3 or similar tool
*Run iperf3 or similar on a target connected host OS which is able to saturate fabric
*run test from inside toolbox container to target
*repeat for distrobox/rootful container of same image
*repeat from host network userspace
Expected behaviour
Throughput should be roughly analogous for all three scenarios
Actual behaviour
toolbox containers top out around 3.5gbit
Screenshots
Attached
Output of toolbox --version (v0.0.90+)
toolbox version 0.0.99.5
Toolbx package info (rpm -q toolbox)
toolbox-0.0.99.5-11.fc40.x86_64
Output of podman version
Client: Podman Engine
Version: 5.2.2
API Version: 5.2.2
Go Version: go1.22.6
Built: Wed Aug 21 12:00:00 2024
OS/Arch: linux/amd64
Podman package info (rpm -q podman)
e.g., podman-1.9.2-1.fc32.x86_64
Info about your OS
Fedora40, Nobara, Bazzite(ublue/kiinote)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
I noticed severe network penalty using the default network/tap setup instatiated for toolbox containers On a 10Gbit connection to a NAS with 20G of bandwidth available to the fabric I am seeing toolbox throughput top out at around 3.5Gbit/s
Rootful distrobox of the same container runs close to line/host kernel rate
Steps how to reproduce the behaviour
*Create a toolbox container using fedora:latest tag - install iperf3 or similar tool
*Run iperf3 or similar on a target connected host OS which is able to saturate fabric
*run test from inside toolbox container to target
*repeat for distrobox/rootful container of same image
*repeat from host network userspace
Expected behaviour
Throughput should be roughly analogous for all three scenarios
Actual behaviour
toolbox containers top out around 3.5gbit
Screenshots
Attached
Output of
toolbox --version
(v0.0.90+)toolbox version 0.0.99.5
Toolbx package info (
rpm -q toolbox
)toolbox-0.0.99.5-11.fc40.x86_64
Output of
podman version
Podman package info (
rpm -q podman
)e.g.,
podman-1.9.2-1.fc32.x86_64
Info about your OS
Fedora40, Nobara, Bazzite(ublue/kiinote)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: