Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom

If running single spec, name output video file using spec name #980

Closed
bahmutov opened this issue Nov 29, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

If running single spec, name output video file using spec name #980

bahmutov opened this issue Nov 29, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees
@bahmutov
Labels
type: enhancement Requested enhancement of existing feature
Milestone
3.0.0

Comments

@bahmutov
Copy link
Contributor

feature

If running a single spec with --spec <filename> instead of random video filename like abc123.mp4 name the video file using the spec base name.

Should especially help when we isolate running each spec (parallel work)
@bahmutov bahmutov added the type: enhancement Requested enhancement of existing feature label Nov 29, 2017
@bahmutov bahmutov self-assigned this Nov 29, 2017
@brian-mann
Copy link
Member

brian-mann commented Nov 29, 2017 •
edited
Loading

This is included as part of issue #681

By chunking runs by spec the video names will always match the spec name. 🎉

Are we taking that issue and splitting into many smaller issues?

EDIT: nevermind I see we made that one an epic and are breaking out the issues. Carry on!

@brian-mann brian-mann added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Feb 1, 2018
@jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane modified the milestones: 2.0.0, 3.0.0 Feb 16, 2018
@jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane modified the milestones: 3.0.0, 3.1.0 Apr 11, 2018
@brian-mann brian-mann mentioned this issue Apr 15, 2018
Merged
@brian-mann
Copy link
Member

Fixed by PR #1583

@jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane added stage: pending release and removed stage: pending release stage: investigating Someone from Cypress is looking into this stage: needs investigating Someone from Cypress needs to look at this stage: ready for work The issue is reproducible and in scope labels May 24, 2018
@brian-mann
Copy link
Member

Released in 3.0.0.

@noahblon noahblon mentioned this issue Jan 9, 2023
Open
@harunpehlivan harunpehlivan mentioned this issue Jan 10, 2023
Open
@schanne schanne mentioned this issue Jan 10, 2023
Open
@ajesse11x ajesse11x mentioned this issue Jan 10, 2023
Open
@schanne schanne mentioned this issue Nov 26, 2023
Open
@noahblon noahblon mentioned this issue Nov 27, 2023
Open
@ajesse11x ajesse11x mentioned this issue Nov 29, 2023
Open
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Assignees

@bahmutov bahmutov

Labels
type: enhancement Requested enhancement of existing feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@brian-mann @jennifer-shehane @bahmutov