Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Comple sucessed, but get wrong result #14

Open
BaldrLector opened this issue Dec 18, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Comple sucessed, but get wrong result #14

BaldrLector opened this issue Dec 18, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@BaldrLector
Copy link

BaldrLector commented Dec 18, 2020

Hi @dgrzech , thanks for your kindly sharing of the source code, it really helps me.
However, when I compile the code and try to run it at the umbrella dataset, I find the wrong result will be produced.

Results at 149 frames,
image

Is the data need any pre-processing?
Thanks for your reply in advance, I very much appreciate it.

@BaldrLector BaldrLector changed the title Wrong results Comple sucessed, but get wrong result Dec 18, 2020
@shubhMaheshwari
Copy link

@BaldrLector were you able to resolve the issue?
I added a print function at line 99 of marching_cubes.cu which somehow made the module work. Below is the result on frame 116.
000116

Without adding the print function, I am getting illegal memory access because the number of active voxels would be 0. I am fairly new to CUDA programming but my assumption is that we are facing some synchronization issue where a GPU thread is accessing some part of memory not initialized.

Adding a print function is just a hack that has significantly increased the computation time. It would be very helpful if @dgrzech could look at it.

I am running the application on
OS: Ubuntu 18.04
g++: 7.5.0
GPU: NVIDIA 1060 (6GB)
Nvidia Driver Version: 450.102.04
CUDA Version: 11.0

Thanks.

@LuyaooChen
Copy link

LuyaooChen commented Jul 8, 2021

I met this issue too. Thanks for @shubhMaheshwari 's help, adding a print function or __syncthreads() at line 99 of marching_cubes.cu is helpful, though I can't locate the problem.
btw I also run dynamicfusion and dynfu, and getting emtpy volume. The number of active voxels is 0. These 3 code base on the similar kfusion module. So I think these are caused by similar reason, but adding a print function at the same position is not helpful to dynamicfusion and dynfu.
My CUDA version is 10.2 .

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants