You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @dgrzech , thanks for your kindly sharing of the source code, it really helps me.
However, when I compile the code and try to run it at the umbrella dataset, I find the wrong result will be produced.
Results at 149 frames,
Is the data need any pre-processing?
Thanks for your reply in advance, I very much appreciate it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
BaldrLector
changed the title
Wrong results
Comple sucessed, but get wrong result
Dec 18, 2020
@BaldrLector were you able to resolve the issue?
I added a print function at line 99 of marching_cubes.cu which somehow made the module work. Below is the result on frame 116.
Without adding the print function, I am getting illegal memory access because the number of active voxels would be 0. I am fairly new to CUDA programming but my assumption is that we are facing some synchronization issue where a GPU thread is accessing some part of memory not initialized.
Adding a print function is just a hack that has significantly increased the computation time. It would be very helpful if @dgrzech could look at it.
I am running the application on
OS: Ubuntu 18.04
g++: 7.5.0
GPU: NVIDIA 1060 (6GB)
Nvidia Driver Version: 450.102.04
CUDA Version: 11.0
I met this issue too. Thanks for @shubhMaheshwari 's help, adding a print function or __syncthreads() at line 99 of marching_cubes.cu is helpful, though I can't locate the problem.
btw I also run dynamicfusion and dynfu, and getting emtpy volume. The number of active voxels is 0. These 3 code base on the similar kfusion module. So I think these are caused by similar reason, but adding a print function at the same position is not helpful to dynamicfusion and dynfu.
My CUDA version is 10.2 .
Hi @dgrzech , thanks for your kindly sharing of the source code, it really helps me.
However, when I compile the code and try to run it at the umbrella dataset, I find the wrong result will be produced.
Results at 149 frames,
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/19874480/102579484-7fea4b80-4137-11eb-8bd7-b878454a2bcc.png)
Is the data need any pre-processing?
Thanks for your reply in advance, I very much appreciate it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: