[Meta] Clean up of issues

[PonteIneptique]

I'd like to do some clean up in the issues : I propose the following to be closed (because they are not relevant to our current workflow. Their content will still be available...) :

• Create a web viewer from select parts of different works in a common corpus #2
• Study and retrieve quotes in different manuscripts with images #3
• Retrieve transcriptions of marginal notes #4
• Retrieve identifiers based on author/textgroup name or by place #5
• Diod. 12.40 #6
• Get to a standard result #7
• get any text, not just canonical #8
• skipping directly to text for inscriptions or papyri  #9
• grouping for inscriptions and papyri #10
• my texts are not in your canon... #11
• we should support a response that includes just TEI #12 (Actually this one is fixed)
• Terminology: Need a Glossary #15
• Use Case L2: Query if a work is available #16
• Use Case L3: query if a specific version is available #17
• Redirect from one specific version to a second version of a DTS Text #20
• Make the ability to state the licence of a readable collection #24 (fixed by dc:metadata)
• ability to check reference validity without retrieving passage #26
• Passage and passage references methods should be identifier agnostic #27
• Move User Stories to CSV #30
• Apply agreed up terminology to user stories #31
• Naming authorities and Identity URNs #32 (Irrelevant with current choices for the moment)

So in general User Stories or things that were fixed

[balmas]

I don't object to closing these but I think as we do so we should add comments which state explicitly the reason why. Some of these were determined to be out of scope, but others were actually implemented in some way in the specification. It would be good to be clear about which is which.