Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Enhancement: Evaluate rucio-automatix if it can replace our loadtests #849

Open
haozturk opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@haozturk
Copy link
Contributor

haozturk commented Oct 3, 2024

Enhancement Description

@dynamic-entropy made me realize that this daemon is very similar to what our loadtests do (at least from its description). I haven't checked this daemon myself. Before that, let me ask @nsmith- and @ericvaandering if somebody has looked into it.

[1] https://rucio.github.io/documentation/bin/rucio-automatix/

Use Case

Better support for loadtests

Possible Solution

Use automatix instead of cms loadtests if it's capable of achieving what we need.

Related Issues

No response

@ericvaandering
Copy link
Member

As I recall @nsmith- did look at this way back and decided that what automatix did was NOT what we wanted (or were doing). I stayed far enough from the details that I can't say a lot more.

@nsmith-
Copy link
Contributor

nsmith- commented Oct 4, 2024

I can't recall much from then but looking at https://github.com/rucio/rucio/blob/master/lib/rucio/daemons/automatix/automatix.py it looks to only upload files to RSEs, rather than transfer a set of files between two RSEs at some regular interval.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants