-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
Migrations: Improve functional test coverage #1141
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Comments
Here are some scenarios I want to cover.
|
Just wanted to know the state of migration functional tests before attacking migrations in PostgreSQL... There seem to be some non-inherited migration tests within each provider's testsuite but nothing comprehensive I can actually use. Should I wait a bit, are there plans to work on this? |
@roji, So far, there are just unit tests to verify the SQL. You can copy these to use in your own unit tests. I also plan to create some provider-inheritable functional tests. I started in bricelam:migtests, but they were way too slow! We have some ideas on how to do it faster, but I haven't gotten around to implementing it yet. |
I've added some basic functional tests that cover the |
Closing. I feel like our coverage is pretty decent now. We'll rely on app building, exploratory testing, and code coverage analysis for more. Creating more provider-agnostic tests will be done as part of #1807. |
Probably by porting existing tests from EF6
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: