We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
If you have multiple functions calling one function, it will look like this.
{ "path": "~~~", "line": 1, "func_name": "called_func", "type_comments": [ "(int) -> int" "(int) -> str" ], "samples": 2 },
I would like to know which function calls the called_func in this case.
called_func
{ "path": "~~~", "line": 1, "func_name": "called_func", "type_comments": [ { "calling1_func": "(int) -> int", } { "calling2_func": "(int) -> str", } ], "samples": 2 },
... because there are chances to have 10 or more samples (sadly).
This must change the code below (and more. such as FunctionKey), but it maybe gets slower.
FunctionKey
pyannotate/pyannotate_runtime/collect_types.py
Lines 446 to 448 in 1e7ddf0
So I want to know if this proposal is ideal or not. If ideal I think I can contribute when I have a time (maybe late of this month)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
If you have multiple functions calling one function, it will look like this.
I would like to know which function calls the
called_func
in this case.... because there are chances to have 10 or more samples (sadly).
remarks
This must change the code below (and more. such as
FunctionKey
), but it maybe gets slower.pyannotate/pyannotate_runtime/collect_types.py
Lines 446 to 448 in 1e7ddf0
So I want to know if this proposal is ideal or not. If ideal I think I can contribute when I have a time (maybe late of this month)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: