We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
If I'm not wrong, currently the where condition for the cursor values is built in this format:
where
where cursor_field1 > x and cursor_field2 > y
But we could use a composite value (when the fields are compared with same operator)?
where (cursor_field1, cursor_field2) > (x, y)
A composite is ordered left-to-right with further right fields only breaking ties.
So I think it is faster as the fields on the right are only compared in case of ties?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
If I'm not wrong, currently the
where
condition for the cursor values is built in this format:But we could use a composite value (when the fields are compared with same operator)?
A composite is ordered left-to-right with further right fields only breaking ties.
So I think it is faster as the fields on the right are only compared in case of ties?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: