Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Performance on the test set is lower than the paper #68

Open
HaoRan-hash opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Performance on the test set is lower than the paper #68

HaoRan-hash opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@HaoRan-hash
Copy link

Hi, @X-Lai. First of all, thanks for open-sourcing your excellent work!
I achieved comparable performance to the paper on both the semantickitti and nuscenes validation set, but much lower on the test set.
I've read #52 #1.
Can you release the code (update the repository) for the tricks you are using for test set? Or the model files? That way people can follow your work better and make your work more impactful.

@completezealous
Copy link

Hi, @X-Lai. First of all, thanks for open-sourcing your excellent work! I achieved comparable performance to the paper on both the semantickitti and nuscenes validation set, but much lower on the test set. I've read #52 #1. Can you release the code (update the repository) for the tricks you are using for test set? Or the model files? That way people can follow your work better and make your work more impactful.

hello,How do you save the prediction signature of the test set? Can you share the code?Thanks a lot!

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants