Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Docker image not functional #96

Open
mohaidoss opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #97
Open

Docker image not functional #96

mohaidoss opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #97

Comments

@mohaidoss
Copy link

Hi, running apkleaks through the docker image using the command below
docker run -it --platform=linux/x86_64 --rm -v /tmp/apks:/tmp dwisiswant0/apkleaks:latest -f /tmp/base.apk
ends up with the following error message

     _    ____  _  ___               _
    / \  |  _ \| |/ / |    ___  __ _| | _____
   / _ \ | |_) | ' /| |   / _ \/ _` | |/ / __|
  / ___ \|  __/| . \| |__|  __/ (_| |   <\__ \
 /_/   \_\_|   |_|\_\_____\___|\__,_|_|\_\___/
 v2.6.3
 --
 Scanning APK file for URIs, endpoints & secrets
 (c) 2020-2024, dwisiswant0

Can't find jadx binary.
Do you want to download jadx? (Y/n) Y

** Downloading jadx...

** Decompiling APK...

ERROR: JAVA_HOME is not set and no 'java' command could be found in your PATH.

Please set the JAVA_HOME variable in your environment to match the
location of your Java installation.


** Scanning against 'xx.xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx'

** Done with nothing. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Along with the fix, why isn't jadx included by default in the image ? User end up re-installing jadx every run.

I'm available to contribute :p

@dwisiswant0
Copy link
Owner

I'm available to contribute :p

Yeah, talk is cheap, send patches.

@mohaidoss mohaidoss linked a pull request Nov 5, 2024 that will close this issue
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants