You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is important for people to be able to differentiate between a node that is compliant with a standard completely, and a node that is compliant, but only because it has some kind of approved deviation. We need a way to determine what these are and surface them in Kriterion.
Ideas:
Tell Kriterion about one certname per standard which should be considered to be the source of truth for resource parameters, then, if a node checks in with an unchanged resource but the parameters are different from those of the "golden" node, it gets highlighted as "compliant...ish" or something better. You get the idea
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It is important for people to be able to differentiate between a node that is compliant with a standard completely, and a node that is compliant, but only because it has some kind of approved deviation. We need a way to determine what these are and surface them in Kriterion.
Ideas:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: