You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We use ?utm_source=x and similar parameter URLs to track ads, and more. However we have had multiple reports from SEO-firms that these are picked up by Google and other webcrawlers as potential multiple pages. So, a solution for us is to actively use the canonical meta-data to make sure spiders only track the absolutely correct URL (no trailing slash, no URL parameters, etc). This works for all sub-pages, but not for the main site content since it has a <allowPath>${site}/*</allowPath> making the site itself unselectable in the list. Is this fixable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We use
?utm_source=x
and similar parameter URLs to track ads, and more. However we have had multiple reports from SEO-firms that these are picked up by Google and other webcrawlers as potential multiple pages. So, a solution for us is to actively use the canonical meta-data to make sure spiders only track the absolutely correct URL (no trailing slash, no URL parameters, etc). This works for all sub-pages, but not for the main site content since it has a<allowPath>${site}/*</allowPath>
making the site itself unselectable in the list. Is this fixable?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: