refactor: optimize date range picker component #3592
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request refactors the predefined date range logic in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant DRP as DateRangePicker
participant PR as PredefinedRanges
participant CH as createRangeHelper
participant DF as date-fns (startOfDay & isEqual)
DRP->>PR: Pass date range handler & current range
PR->>CH: Request generation of range actions
CH->>DF: Compute startOfDay & perform isEqual check
DF-->>CH: Return computed date comparisons
CH-->>PR: Provide range actions with selection logic
PR-->>DRP: Return optimized predefined ranges
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
apps/web/app/[locale]/timesheet/[memberId]/components/TimesheetDetailModal.tsxOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.46.0 ESLint couldn't find the config "next/core-web-vitals" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct. The config "next/core-web-vitals" was referenced from the config file in "/apps/web/.eslintrc.json". If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. apps/web/app/[locale]/dashboard/team-dashboard/[teamId]/components/date-range-picker.tsxOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.46.0 ESLint couldn't find the config "next/core-web-vitals" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct. The config "next/core-web-vitals" was referenced from the config file in "/apps/web/.eslintrc.json". If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/app/[locale]/dashboard/team-dashboard/[teamId]/components/date-range-picker.tsx (1)
174-257: Update component name to match interface name.After renaming the interface to
PredefinedRangeProps, update the component implementation for consistency.Apply this diff:
-const PredefinedRanges = ({ handleDateRangeChange, t, dateRange }: IpredefineRange) => { +const PredefinedRanges = ({ handleDateRangeChange, t, dateRange }: PredefinedRangeProps) => {Otherwise, the implementation looks good:
- Proper use of useMemo for performance optimization
- Consistent button styling
- Well-structured predefined ranges
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Cspell
[warning] 174-174:
Unknown word (Ipredefine)🪛 GitHub Actions: Check Spelling and Typos with cspell
[warning] 174-174: Unknown word (Ipredefine)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/web/app/[locale]/dashboard/team-dashboard/[teamId]/components/date-range-picker.tsx(3 hunks)apps/web/app/[locale]/timesheet/[memberId]/components/TimesheetDetailModal.tsx(9 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/web/app/[locale]/timesheet/[memberId]/components/TimesheetDetailModal.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Cspell
apps/web/app/[locale]/dashboard/team-dashboard/[teamId]/components/date-range-picker.tsx
[warning] 141-141:
Unknown word (Ipredefine)
[warning] 174-174:
Unknown word (Ipredefine)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Check Spelling and Typos with cspell
apps/web/app/[locale]/dashboard/team-dashboard/[teamId]/components/date-range-picker.tsx
[warning] 141-141: Unknown word (Ipredefine)
[warning] 174-174: Unknown word (Ipredefine)
[error] 2 spelling issues found in 1 of the 2 files checked.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: deploy
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/web/app/[locale]/dashboard/team-dashboard/[teamId]/components/date-range-picker.tsx (3)
20-21: LGTM! Import changes support the refactoring goals.The added imports enhance type safety and date comparison consistency.
Also applies to: 26-26
101-101: LGTM! Good separation of concerns.Extracting predefined ranges into a separate component improves modularity and maintainability.
149-172: LGTM! Well-structured helper function.The
createRangeHelperfunction:
- Reduces code duplication
- Ensures consistent date comparison
- Properly handles edge cases
apps/web/app/[locale]/dashboard/team-dashboard/[teamId]/components/date-range-picker.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/app/[locale]/dashboard/team-dashboard/[teamId]/components/date-range-picker.tsx (2)
149-172: Consider memoizing createRangeHelper results.While the factory pattern effectively reduces code duplication, consider memoizing the results to prevent unnecessary recreations of action and isSelected functions.
const createRangeHelper = (handleDateRangeChange: (range: DateRange | undefined) => void) => { - return (getRange: DateRangeGetter) => { + return React.useCallback((getRange: DateRangeGetter) => { const range = getRange(); return { action: () => { @@ -169,6 +169,6 @@ } }; - }; + }, [handleDateRangeChange]); };
174-256: Consider memoizing weekOptions.The component is well-implemented with good performance optimizations. Consider memoizing weekOptions to prevent unnecessary recreations.
const PredefinedRanges = ({ handleDateRangeChange, t, dateRange }: PredefinedRangeProps) => { const createRange = createRangeHelper(handleDateRangeChange); - const weekOptions = { weekStartsOn: 1 as const }; + const weekOptions = React.useMemo(() => ({ weekStartsOn: 1 as const }), []);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.cspell.json(1 hunks)apps/web/app/[locale]/dashboard/team-dashboard/[teamId]/components/date-range-picker.tsx(3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .cspell.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: deploy
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/web/app/[locale]/dashboard/team-dashboard/[teamId]/components/date-range-picker.tsx (3)
20-21: LGTM! Import changes enhance date comparison accuracy.The addition of
startOfDayandisEqualfrom date-fns, along with theTranslationHookstype, improves date comparison precision and type safety.Also applies to: 26-26
101-101: LGTM! Good separation of concerns.Extracting predefined ranges into a separate component improves code organization and maintainability.
141-145: Follow TypeScript naming conventions for interfaces.The interface name
PredefinedRangePropsshould be used to follow TypeScript naming conventions.
|
@Innocent-Akim please resolve merge conflicts |
- Extract PredefinedRanges into a separate component for better maintainability - Implement createRangeHelper factory function to reduce code duplication - Add memoization for predefined ranges to prevent unnecessary recalculations - Improve type safety with DateRangeGetter type - Standardize date comparison using startOfDay - Enhance UI with consistent button styling and layout Performance improvements: - Reduce redundant date calculations - Prevent unnecessary re-renders with useMemo - Centralize date range creation logic Technical improvements: - Better type safety - More maintainable code structure - Consistent date handling
…n date-range-picker
Innocent-Akim
force-pushed
the
refactor/optimize-date-range-picker
branch
from
dd45199 to
0fc2b38
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/app/[locale]/dashboard/team-dashboard/[teamId]/components/date-range-picker.tsx (2)
165-188: Consider memoizing the range object.While the implementation is correct, the range object could be memoized to prevent unnecessary object creation on each selection check.
const createRangeHelper = (handleDateRangeChange: (range: DateRange | undefined) => void) => { return (getRange: DateRangeGetter) => { - const range = getRange(); + const range = React.useMemo(() => getRange(), []); return { action: () => { const newRange = {
190-277: Consider moving weekOptions outside the component.The weekOptions object is static and doesn't need to be recreated on each render. Consider moving it outside the component scope.
+const weekOptions = { weekStartsOn: 1 as const }; + const PredefinedRanges = ({ handleDateRangeChange, t, dateRange }: PredefinedRangeProps) => { - const weekOptions = { weekStartsOn: 1 as const };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.cspell.json(1 hunks)apps/web/app/[locale]/dashboard/team-dashboard/[teamId]/components/date-range-picker.tsx(3 hunks)apps/web/app/[locale]/timesheet/[memberId]/components/TimesheetDetailModal.tsx(9 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- .cspell.json
- apps/web/app/[locale]/timesheet/[memberId]/components/TimesheetDetailModal.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: deploy
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/web/app/[locale]/dashboard/team-dashboard/[teamId]/components/date-range-picker.tsx (2)
129-130: LGTM! Good separation of concerns.The extraction of predefined ranges into a separate component improves code organization and maintainability.
157-164: LGTM! Good type definitions.The interface and type definitions enhance type safety and follow TypeScript naming conventions.
Performance improvements:
Technical improvements:
Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issues.
Type of Change
Checklist
Previous screenshots
Please add here videos or images of the previous status
Current screenshots
Please add here videos or images of the current (new) status
Summary by CodeRabbit