You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The test suite expects a 4xx failure response for requests containing an unsupported Want-Digest header.
For example, given Want-Digest: abc in the request, the test suite expects a 400 Bad Request response.
This, however, does not align with RFC 3230. Nowhere does it state in that specification that a server, when presented with an unsupported digest value, must (or even should) respond with a 4xx error. In fact, there is already a simple mechanism defined by RFC 3230 to determine whether a digest is supported: look for it in the Digest header of the response.
If a client sends an unsupported Want-Digest value, such as abc, the test suite should simply verify that no Digest: abc=<....> value is present in the response.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The test suite expects a 4xx failure response for requests containing an unsupported
Want-Digest
header.For example, given
Want-Digest: abc
in the request, the test suite expects a400 Bad Request
response.This, however, does not align with RFC 3230. Nowhere does it state in that specification that a server, when presented with an unsupported digest value, must (or even should) respond with a 4xx error. In fact, there is already a simple mechanism defined by RFC 3230 to determine whether a digest is supported: look for it in the
Digest
header of the response.If a client sends an unsupported
Want-Digest
value, such asabc
, the test suite should simply verify that noDigest: abc=<....>
value is present in the response.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: