Skip to content

com.google.cloud:libraries-bom dependency needs to be upgraded in pom.xml #678

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
dconeybe opened this issue May 17, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #690
Closed

com.google.cloud:libraries-bom dependency needs to be upgraded in pom.xml #678

dconeybe opened this issue May 17, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #690
Assignees

Comments

@dconeybe
Copy link

The dependency on com.google.cloud:libraries-bom in pom.xml is almost one year old, and needs to be upgraded.

It looks like "dependabot" has not been doing its job, since the last time it bumped the bom was almost one year ago in July 2021: #583

pom.xml currently uses bom version 20.9.0, but the latest version is 25.3.0.

upgrading is highly desirable to pick up the following fix: googleapis/java-firestore#875

Note that I am a Googler. Feel free to DM me at dconeybe@ or comment on b/232419509

@dconeybe
Copy link
Author

Here is the part of pom.xml that uses the old bom:

firebase-admin-java/pom.xml

Lines 386 to 388 in 14c7ade

<groupId>com.google.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>libraries-bom</artifactId>
<version>20.9.0</version>

@lahirumaramba
Copy link
Member

lahirumaramba commented May 17, 2022

Thank you @dconeybe! This issue is on the top of my list. It seems like upgrading the BOM breaks our CIs on Java 7 #675. We will most likely have to drop support for Java 7 (a breaking change) before upgrading the com.google.cloud:libraries-bom. We are currently planning this major release of the SDK.

@lahirumaramba
Copy link
Member

This is now fixed in v9.0.0. Thank you!

@dconeybe
Copy link
Author

Awesome. Thanks @lahirumaramba!

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants