You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the moment, every TileLayer has a backgroundColor property that defaults to a grey color. This means that, to layer multiple TileLayers on top of each other (for example, one with a base map, and one with some hiking trails), the user must manually set the backgroundColor property on the top layer to Colors.transparent.
Instead, a simpler interaction might be to remove the backgroundColor property from the TileLayer (replacing it's internal usage with Colors.transparent), and add it to MapOptions. A standard ColoredBox can then be inserted internally as the lowest layer, with its color as backgroundColor.
What other alternatives are available?
No response
Can you provide any other information?
No response
Severity
Annoying: Currently have to use workarounds
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What do you want implemented?
At the moment, every
TileLayer
has abackgroundColor
property that defaults to a grey color. This means that, to layer multipleTileLayer
s on top of each other (for example, one with a base map, and one with some hiking trails), the user must manually set thebackgroundColor
property on the top layer toColors.transparent
.Instead, a simpler interaction might be to remove the
backgroundColor
property from theTileLayer
(replacing it's internal usage withColors.transparent
), and add it toMapOptions
. A standardColoredBox
can then be inserted internally as the lowest layer, with its color asbackgroundColor
.What other alternatives are available?
No response
Can you provide any other information?
No response
Severity
Annoying: Currently have to use workarounds
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: