Rollup merge of rust-lang#120062 - davidtwco:llvm-data-layout-check, r=wesleywiser

llvm: change data layout bug to an error and make it trigger more

Fixes rust-lang#33446.

Don't skip the inconsistent data layout check for custom LLVMs or non-built-in targets.

With rust-lang#118708, all targets will have a simple test that would trigger this error if LLVM's data layouts do change - so data layouts would be corrected during the LLVM upgrade. Therefore, with builtin targets, this error won't happen with our LLVM because each target will have been confirmed to work. With non-builtin targets, this error is probably useful to have because you can change the data layout in your target and if it is wrong then that could lead to bugs.

When using a custom LLVM, the same justification makes sense for non-builtin targets as with our LLVM, the user can update their target to match their LLVM and that's probably a good thing to do. However, with a custom LLVM, the user cannot change the builtin target data layouts if they don't match - though given that the compiler's data layout is used for layout computation and a bunch of other things - you could get some bugs because of the mismatch and probably want to know about that. I'm not sure if this is something that people do and is okay, but I doubt it?

`CFG_LLVM_ROOT` was also always set during local development with `download-ci-llvm` so this bug would never trigger locally.

In rust-lang#33446, two points are raised:

- In the issue itself, changing this from a `bug!` to a proper error is what is suggested, by using `isCompatibleDataLayout` from LLVM, but that function still just does the same thing that we do and check for equality, so I've avoided the additional code necessary to do that FFI call.
- `@Mark-Simulacrum` suggests a different check is necessary to maintain backwards compatibility with old LLVM versions. I don't know how often this comes up, but we can do that with some simple string manipulation + LLVM version checks as happens already for LLVM 17 just above this diff.

Author: fmease

Diff for: compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/messages.ftl

@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ codegen_llvm_lto_dylib = lto cannot be used for `dylib` crate type without `-Zdy
 
 codegen_llvm_lto_proc_macro = lto cannot be used for `proc-macro` crate type without `-Zdylib-lto`
 
+codegen_llvm_mismatch_data_layout =
+    data-layout for target `{$rustc_target}`, `{$rustc_layout}`, differs from LLVM target's `{$llvm_target}` default layout, `{$llvm_layout}`
+
 codegen_llvm_missing_features =
     add the missing features in a `target_feature` attribute
 

Diff for: compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/context.rs

@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ use rustc_target::spec::{HasTargetSpec, RelocModel, Target, TlsModel};
 use smallvec::SmallVec;
 
 use libc::c_uint;
+use std::borrow::Borrow;
 use std::cell::{Cell, RefCell};
 use std::ffi::CStr;
 use std::str;
@@ -155,42 +156,21 @@ pub unsafe fn create_module<'ll>(
     }
 
     // Ensure the data-layout values hardcoded remain the defaults.
-    if sess.target.is_builtin {
-        // tm is disposed by its drop impl
+    {
         let tm = crate::back::write::create_informational_target_machine(tcx.sess);
         llvm::LLVMRustSetDataLayoutFromTargetMachine(llmod, &tm);
 
         let llvm_data_layout = llvm::LLVMGetDataLayoutStr(llmod);
         let llvm_data_layout = str::from_utf8(CStr::from_ptr(llvm_data_layout).to_bytes())
             .expect("got a non-UTF8 data-layout from LLVM");
 
-        // Unfortunately LLVM target specs change over time, and right now we
-        // don't have proper support to work with any more than one
-        // `data_layout` than the one that is in the rust-lang/rust repo. If
-        // this compiler is configured against a custom LLVM, we may have a
-        // differing data layout, even though we should update our own to use
-        // that one.
-        //
-        // As an interim hack, if CFG_LLVM_ROOT is not an empty string then we
-        // disable this check entirely as we may be configured with something
-        // that has a different target layout.
-        //
-        // Unsure if this will actually cause breakage when rustc is configured
-        // as such.
-        //
-        // FIXME(#34960)
-        let cfg_llvm_root = option_env!("CFG_LLVM_ROOT").unwrap_or("");
-        let custom_llvm_used = !cfg_llvm_root.trim().is_empty();
-
-        if !custom_llvm_used && target_data_layout != llvm_data_layout {
-            bug!(
-                "data-layout for target `{rustc_target}`, `{rustc_layout}`, \
-                  differs from LLVM target's `{llvm_target}` default layout, `{llvm_layout}`",
-                rustc_target = sess.opts.target_triple,
-                rustc_layout = target_data_layout,
-                llvm_target = sess.target.llvm_target,
-                llvm_layout = llvm_data_layout
-            );
+        if target_data_layout != llvm_data_layout {
+            tcx.dcx().emit_err(crate::errors::MismatchedDataLayout {
+                rustc_target: sess.opts.target_triple.to_string().as_str(),
+                rustc_layout: target_data_layout.as_str(),
+                llvm_target: sess.target.llvm_target.borrow(),
+                llvm_layout: llvm_data_layout,
+            });
         }
     }
 

Diff for: compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/errors.rs

@@ -244,3 +244,12 @@ pub(crate) struct CopyBitcode {
 pub struct UnknownCompression {
     pub algorithm: &'static str,
 }
+
+#[derive(Diagnostic)]
+#[diag(codegen_llvm_mismatch_data_layout)]
+pub struct MismatchedDataLayout<'a> {
+    pub rustc_target: &'a str,
+    pub rustc_layout: &'a str,
+    pub llvm_target: &'a str,
+    pub llvm_layout: &'a str,
+}

Diff for: src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/compile.rs

@@ -1113,16 +1113,11 @@ pub fn rustc_cargo_env(
 /// Pass down configuration from the LLVM build into the build of
 /// rustc_llvm and rustc_codegen_llvm.
 fn rustc_llvm_env(builder: &Builder<'_>, cargo: &mut Cargo, target: TargetSelection) {
-    let target_config = builder.config.target_config.get(&target);
-
     if builder.is_rust_llvm(target) {
         cargo.env("LLVM_RUSTLLVM", "1");
     }
     let llvm::LlvmResult { llvm_config, .. } = builder.ensure(llvm::Llvm { target });
     cargo.env("LLVM_CONFIG", &llvm_config);
-    if let Some(s) = target_config.and_then(|c| c.llvm_config.as_ref()) {
-        cargo.env("CFG_LLVM_ROOT", s);
-    }
 
     // Some LLVM linker flags (-L and -l) may be needed to link `rustc_llvm`. Its build script
     // expects these to be passed via the `LLVM_LINKER_FLAGS` env variable, separated by

Diff for: src/tools/tidy/src/ui_tests.rs

@@ -24,9 +24,10 @@ const EXPECTED_TEST_FILE_EXTENSIONS: &[&str] = &[
 
 const EXTENSION_EXCEPTION_PATHS: &[&str] = &[
     "tests/ui/asm/named-asm-labels.s", // loading an external asm file to test named labels lint
-    "tests/ui/check-cfg/my-awesome-platform.json", // testing custom targets with cfgs
-    "tests/ui/commandline-argfile-badutf8.args", // passing args via a file
-    "tests/ui/commandline-argfile.args", // passing args via a file
+    "tests/ui/codegen/mismatched-data-layout.json", // testing mismatched data layout w/ custom targets
+    "tests/ui/check-cfg/my-awesome-platform.json",  // testing custom targets with cfgs
+    "tests/ui/commandline-argfile-badutf8.args",    // passing args via a file
+    "tests/ui/commandline-argfile.args",            // passing args via a file
     "tests/ui/crate-loading/auxiliary/libfoo.rlib", // testing loading a manually created rlib
     "tests/ui/include-macros/data.bin", // testing including data with the include macros
     "tests/ui/include-macros/file.txt", // testing including data with the include macros

Diff for: tests/run-make/target-specs/Makefile

@@ -9,4 +9,4 @@ all:
 	$(RUSTC) -Z unstable-options --target=my-awesome-platform.json --print target-spec-json > $(TMPDIR)/test-platform.json && $(RUSTC) -Z unstable-options --target=$(TMPDIR)/test-platform.json --print target-spec-json | diff -q $(TMPDIR)/test-platform.json -
 	$(RUSTC) foo.rs --target=definitely-not-builtin-target 2>&1 | $(CGREP) 'may not set is_builtin'
 	$(RUSTC) foo.rs --target=endianness-mismatch 2>&1 | $(CGREP) '"data-layout" claims architecture is little-endian'
-	$(RUSTC) foo.rs --target=mismatching-data-layout --crate-type=lib
+	$(RUSTC) foo.rs --target=mismatching-data-layout --crate-type=lib 2>&1 | $(CGREP) 'data-layout for target'

Diff for: tests/ui/codegen/mismatched-data-layout.json

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+    "llvm-target": "x86_64-unknown-none-gnu",
+    "data-layout": "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128",
+    "arch": "x86_64",
+    "target-endian": "little",
+    "target-pointer-width": "64",
+    "target-c-int-width": "32",
+    "os": "unknown",
+    "linker-flavor": "ld.lld",
+    "linker": "rust-lld",
+    "executables": true
+}
+

Diff for: tests/ui/codegen/mismatched-data-layouts.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// This test checks that data layout mismatches emit an error.
+//
+// build-fail
+// needs-llvm-components: x86
+// compile-flags: --crate-type=lib --target={{src-base}}/codegen/mismatched-data-layout.json -Z unstable-options
+// error-pattern: differs from LLVM target's
+// normalize-stderr-test: "`, `[A-Za-z0-9-:]*`" -> "`, `normalized data layout`"
+// normalize-stderr-test: "layout, `[A-Za-z0-9-:]*`" -> "layout, `normalized data layout`"
+
+#![feature(lang_items, no_core, auto_traits)]
+#![no_core]
+
+#[lang = "sized"]
+trait Sized {}

Diff for: tests/ui/codegen/mismatched-data-layouts.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+error: data-layout for target `mismatched-data-layout-7814813422914914169`, `normalized data layout`, differs from LLVM target's `x86_64-unknown-none-gnu` default layout, `normalized data layout`
+
+error: aborting due to 1 previous error
+