-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
Consider recommendation of Encryptr as Password manager #240
Comments
Haven't been using this, will take it for a spin. Looks like there's no way to verify package downloads of Encryptr, via a GPG signature or otherwise, so I don't think we should recommend it just yet. Happy to test drive it, though. |
Yeah, it's been out for a while w/ no GPG sig any of the desktop platforms. Note we're already recommending some other software (e.g., Adium) that has HTTPS downloads, but no sig. They do have an APT repo for Linux. |
Link? Can't find on their website. |
FWIW, we should not be recommending Adium. That recommendation is simply an artifact of Encryption Works having been written in 2013 and not really updated since. Adium is barely being maintained, their recent changelog entries do not inspire confidence, and I think it is probably a risk to recommend it these days. Which is sad, because I really used to ❤️ Adium. |
Completely agree. Poked around earlier this week to confirm that Adium is as deprecated as I'd thought, and it should be removed from the guide entirely. |
Unfortunately that apt repo is only relevant for the |
That's too bad. We should poke them about that. For a company that seems to have a lot of cryptographic engineer talent, I'm surprised their software distribution practices aren't better. |
Have been using Encryptr for e2ee cloud password management lately, and am definitely a fan. FOSS, audited, very user-friendly, supports all major mobile and desktop OSs, made by SpiderOak. I think we should consider it for inclusion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: