We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
It would be useful to have an implementation of the CMB Dipole as a separate component in PySM.
I have a simple implementation here:
https://github.com/CMB-S4/s4mapbasedsims/blob/master/202102_design_tool_input/utils/create_cmb_solar_dipole.ipynb
However it would be nice to also have the option of activating the frequency dependent quadrupole, see implementation in toast:
https://github.com/hpc4cmb/toast/blob/ddae67de4154067d2317999f6cf6c31dd48ae047/src/toast/todmap/todmap_math.py#L552-L556
So we could have:
dip1
dip2
@keskitalo @giuspugl @brandonshensley @seclark any feedback?
No hurry, it will be some time before I can start working on this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry, something went wrong.
Yes, please!
Thanks @zonca for addressing this! As i already commented here i am totally up to have the dipole as a separated component!
zonca
No branches or pull requests
It would be useful to have an implementation of the CMB Dipole as a separate component in PySM.
I have a simple implementation here:
https://github.com/CMB-S4/s4mapbasedsims/blob/master/202102_design_tool_input/utils/create_cmb_solar_dipole.ipynb
However it would be nice to also have the option of activating the frequency dependent quadrupole, see implementation in toast:
https://github.com/hpc4cmb/toast/blob/ddae67de4154067d2317999f6cf6c31dd48ae047/src/toast/todmap/todmap_math.py#L552-L556
So we could have:
dip1
: dipole without frequency dependence using NPIPE parameters 3366.6 ± 2.7 263.986 ± 0.035 48.247 ± 0.023 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.04997.pdfdip2
: same asdip1
with frequency dependent quadrupole correction@keskitalo @giuspugl @brandonshensley @seclark any feedback?
No hurry, it will be some time before I can start working on this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: