Warning: Code scanning cannot determine the alerts introduced by this pull request, because 1 configuration present on refs/heads/main was not found:
why does _CodeQL_ require configuration now?
#19350
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Sorry if this is the wrong spot to post. The root of this forum was the second of 2 results for "configuration present on refs/heads/main was not found:" (alphagov/router#436 was the first result), so don't know where to post. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
👋 @SwuduSusuwu The As far as I can see I think you already solved your problem by force pushing on your preview branch, right? Maybe having rebased on trunk? Github Actions scanning (which searches for vulnerabilities in your workflows and actions Please feel free to answer here if your problem still persists. @bogdanap as you're on call for code scanning, feel free to weigh in if I missed something 🙂 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Have used
CodeQL
since the start of 2024, and this always passes, until now:https://github.com/SwuduSusuwu/SubStack/runs/40979128378
SwuduSusuwu/SusuLib#61

Have never had .github/workflows/codeql.yml and don't know if GitHub now requires this nor what to do.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions