Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Introduce single variant record custom types first #139

Open
lpil opened this issue Jan 26, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #140
Open

Introduce single variant record custom types first #139

lpil opened this issue Jan 26, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #140

Comments

@lpil
Copy link
Member

lpil commented Jan 26, 2025

We introduced them with multiple variances first and then introduce them as records after that. This means that it can be unclear to people how to create a single record or struct, like you would find in another language such as C.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant