You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've attached a chart showing performance across multiple jellyfish versions, genome sizes, values of -m (k-mer length) and -t (number of threads). The chart shows that in version 2.3.0 there is a significant performance regression (orders of magnitude), and that the regression is related to threading (performance improves with -t set to 1) and k-mer length (performance is particularly bad at -m value of 15) and has some relation to input size (relative performance improves with larger data within the most problematic regime)
I've attached a chart showing performance across multiple jellyfish versions, genome sizes, values of -m (k-mer length) and -t (number of threads). The chart shows that in version 2.3.0 there is a significant performance regression (orders of magnitude), and that the regression is related to threading (performance improves with -t set to 1) and k-mer length (performance is particularly bad at -m value of 15) and has some relation to input size (relative performance improves with larger data within the most problematic regime)
jellyfish_performance_regression.pdf
I'm happy to provide more information, including original data, testing methodology, and performing additional tests.
Please let me know if there is any other way in which I can help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: