Skip to content

cmd/go: verifying module checksum: TileReader returned bad result slice (tile/8/1/440 len=9, want 8192) #69102

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
nape-max opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
GoCommand cmd/go NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one. WaitingForInfo Issue is not actionable because of missing required information, which needs to be provided.
Milestone

Comments

@nape-max
Copy link

Go version

go version go1.22.5 darwin/arm64

Output of go env in your module/workspace:

GO111MODULE=''
GOARCH='arm64'
GOBIN=''
GOCACHE='/Users/monapedenin/Library/Caches/go-build'
GOENV='/Users/monapedenin/Library/Application Support/go/env'
GOEXE=''
GOEXPERIMENT=''
GOFLAGS=''
GOHOSTARCH='arm64'
GOHOSTOS='darwin'
GOINSECURE=''
GOMODCACHE='/Users/monapedenin/go/pkg/mod'
GONOPROXY=''
GONOSUMDB='go.avito.ru'
GOOS='darwin'
GOPATH='/Users/monapedenin/go'
GOPRIVATE=''
GOROOT='/usr/local/go'
GOSUMDB='sum.golang.org'
GOTMPDIR=''
GOTOOLCHAIN='auto'
GOTOOLDIR='/usr/local/go/pkg/tool/darwin_arm64'
GOVCS=''
GOVERSION='go1.22.5'
GCCGO='gccgo'
AR='ar'
CC='clang'
CXX='clang++'
CGO_ENABLED='1'
GOWORK=''
CGO_CFLAGS='-O2 -g'
CGO_CPPFLAGS=''
CGO_CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g'
CGO_FFLAGS='-O2 -g'
CGO_LDFLAGS='-O2 -g'
PKG_CONFIG='pkg-config'
GOGCCFLAGS='-fPIC -arch arm64 -pthread -fno-caret-diagnostics -Qunused-arguments -fmessage-length=0 -ffile-prefix-map=/var/folders/bx/w_kp2qd57hx5tc3jz_f3y7w80000gn/T/go-build4157840375=/tmp/go-build -gno-record-gcc-switches -fno-common'

What did you do?

Trying to update golang.org/x/sys to v0.24.0

What did you see happen?

go: golang.org/x/sys@v0.24.0: verifying module: golang.org/x/sys@v0.24.0: checking tree#28892633 against tree#28919322: TileReader returned bad result slice (tile/8/1/440 len=9, want 8192)

What did you expect to see?

No errors, just update

@gopherbot gopherbot added this to the Unreleased milestone Aug 28, 2024
@golang golang deleted a comment Aug 28, 2024
@golang golang deleted a comment Aug 28, 2024
@golang golang deleted a comment Aug 28, 2024
@seankhliao seankhliao changed the title x/sys: TileReader returned bad result slice (tile/8/1/440 len=9, want 8192) cmd/go: verifying module checksum: TileReader returned bad result slice (tile/8/1/440 len=9, want 8192) Aug 28, 2024
@seankhliao
Copy link
Member

cc @golang/security

@golang golang deleted a comment Aug 28, 2024
@prattmic
Copy link
Member

cc @matloob @samthanawalla

@prattmic prattmic added the NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one. label Aug 28, 2024
@prattmic prattmic modified the milestones: Unreleased, Backlog Aug 28, 2024
@prattmic prattmic added the GoCommand cmd/go label Aug 28, 2024
@matloob
Copy link
Contributor

matloob commented Sep 3, 2024

I I'd like to see if we could get some more information so we could reproduce:

Which module are you running this in? Is it publicly available? What's the command you ran?

@matloob matloob added the WaitingForInfo Issue is not actionable because of missing required information, which needs to be provided. label Sep 10, 2024
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Timed out in state WaitingForInfo. Closing.

(I am just a bot, though. Please speak up if this is a mistake or you have the requested information.)

@gopherbot gopherbot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 10, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
GoCommand cmd/go NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one. WaitingForInfo Issue is not actionable because of missing required information, which needs to be provided.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants
@prattmic @gopherbot @seankhliao @matloob @nape-max @gabyhelp and others