We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Given a list of words and two words word1 and word2 , return the shortest distance between these two words in the list.
word1 and word2 may be the same and they represent two individual words in the list.
Example: Assume that words = ["practice", "makes", "perfect", "coding", "makes"].
["practice", "makes", "perfect", "coding", "makes"]
Input: _word1_ = “makes”, _word2_ = “coding” Output: 1 Input: _word1_ = "makes", _word2_ = "makes" Output: 3
Note: You may assume word1 and word2 are both in the list.
这道题还是让我们求最短单词距离,有了之前两道题 Shortest Word Distance II 和 Shortest Word Distance 的基础,就大大降低了题目本身的难度。这里增加了一个条件,就是说两个单词可能会相同,所以在第一题中的解法的基础上做一些修改,博主最先想的解法是基于第一题中的解法二,由于会有相同的单词的情况,那么 p1 和 p2 就会相同,这样结果就会变成0,显然不对,所以要对 word1 和 word2 是否的相等的情况分开处理,如果相等了,由于 p1 和 p2 会相同,所以需要一个变量t来记录上一个位置,这样如果t不为 -1,且和当前的 p1 不同,可以更新结果,如果 word1 和 word2 不等,那么还是按原来的方法做,参见代码如下:
解法一:
class Solution { public: int shortestWordDistance(vector<string>& words, string word1, string word2) { int p1 = -1, p2 = -1, res = INT_MAX; for (int i = 0; i < words.size(); ++i) { int t = p1; if (words[i] == word1) p1 = i; if (words[i] == word2) p2 = i; if (p1 != -1 && p2 != -1) { if (word1 == word2 && t != -1 && t != p1) { res = min(res, abs(t - p1)); } else if (p1 != p2) { res = min(res, abs(p1 - p2)); } } } return res; } };
上述代码其实可以优化一下,我们并不需要变量t来记录上一个位置,将 p1 初始化为数组长度,p2 初始化为数组长度的相反数,然后当 word1 和 word2 相等的情况,用 p1 来保存 p2 的结果,p2 赋为当前的位置i,这样就可以更新结果了,如果 word1 和 word2 不相等,则还跟原来的做法一样,这种思路真是挺巧妙的,参见代码如下:
解法二:
class Solution { public: int shortestWordDistance(vector<string>& words, string word1, string word2) { int p1 = words.size(), p2 = -words.size(), res = INT_MAX; for (int i = 0; i < words.size(); ++i) { if (words[i] == word1) p1 = word1 == word2 ? p2 : i; if (words[i] == word2) p2 = i; res = min(res, abs(p1 - p2)); } return res; } };
我们再来看一种更进一步优化的方法,只用一个变量 idx,这个 idx 的作用就相当于记录上一次的位置,当前 idx 不等 -1 时,说明当前i和 idx 不同,然后在 word1 和 word2 相同或者 words[i] 和 words[idx] 相同的情况下更新结果,最后别忘了将 idx 赋为i,参见代码如下;
解法三:
class Solution { public: int shortestWordDistance(vector<string>& words, string word1, string word2) { int idx = -1, res = INT_MAX; for (int i = 0; i < words.size(); ++i) { if (words[i] == word1 || words[i] == word2) { if (idx != -1 && (word1 == word2 || words[i] != words[idx])) { res = min(res, i - idx); } idx = i; } } return res; } };
Github 同步地址:
#245
类似题目:
Shortest Word Distance II
Shortest Word Distance
参考资料:
https://leetcode.com/problems/shortest-word-distance-iii/
https://leetcode.com/problems/shortest-word-distance-iii/discuss/67097/12-16-lines-Java-C%2B%2B
https://leetcode.com/problems/shortest-word-distance-iii/discuss/67095/Short-Java-solution-10-lines-O(n)-modified-from-Shortest-Word-Distance-I
LeetCode All in One 题目讲解汇总(持续更新中...)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
🤔 解法一
// t != p1 应该多余吧 if (word1 == word2 && t != -1 && t != p1) { res = min(res, abs(t - p1)); } else if (p1 != p2) { res = min(res, abs(p1 - p2)); }
Sorry, something went wrong.
不加会出错,比如下面这个例子:
["a","c","a","a"] "a" "a"
No branches or pull requests
Given a list of words and two words word1 and word2 , return the shortest distance between these two words in the list.
word1 and word2 may be the same and they represent two individual words in the list.
Example:
Assume that words =
["practice", "makes", "perfect", "coding", "makes"]
.Note:
You may assume word1 and word2 are both in the list.
这道题还是让我们求最短单词距离,有了之前两道题 Shortest Word Distance II 和 Shortest Word Distance 的基础,就大大降低了题目本身的难度。这里增加了一个条件,就是说两个单词可能会相同,所以在第一题中的解法的基础上做一些修改,博主最先想的解法是基于第一题中的解法二,由于会有相同的单词的情况,那么 p1 和 p2 就会相同,这样结果就会变成0,显然不对,所以要对 word1 和 word2 是否的相等的情况分开处理,如果相等了,由于 p1 和 p2 会相同,所以需要一个变量t来记录上一个位置,这样如果t不为 -1,且和当前的 p1 不同,可以更新结果,如果 word1 和 word2 不等,那么还是按原来的方法做,参见代码如下:
解法一:
上述代码其实可以优化一下,我们并不需要变量t来记录上一个位置,将 p1 初始化为数组长度,p2 初始化为数组长度的相反数,然后当 word1 和 word2 相等的情况,用 p1 来保存 p2 的结果,p2 赋为当前的位置i,这样就可以更新结果了,如果 word1 和 word2 不相等,则还跟原来的做法一样,这种思路真是挺巧妙的,参见代码如下:
解法二:
我们再来看一种更进一步优化的方法,只用一个变量 idx,这个 idx 的作用就相当于记录上一次的位置,当前 idx 不等 -1 时,说明当前i和 idx 不同,然后在 word1 和 word2 相同或者 words[i] 和 words[idx] 相同的情况下更新结果,最后别忘了将 idx 赋为i,参见代码如下;
解法三:
Github 同步地址:
#245
类似题目:
Shortest Word Distance II
Shortest Word Distance
参考资料:
https://leetcode.com/problems/shortest-word-distance-iii/
https://leetcode.com/problems/shortest-word-distance-iii/discuss/67097/12-16-lines-Java-C%2B%2B
https://leetcode.com/problems/shortest-word-distance-iii/discuss/67095/Short-Java-solution-10-lines-O(n)-modified-from-Shortest-Word-Distance-I
LeetCode All in One 题目讲解汇总(持续更新中...)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: