-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 270
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Potential Reorganization #1005
Comments
@manolik this is great, thanks for the suggestions. I see many benefits to a major reorganization:
The only real downside is that it will take more effort to write and especially to edit. I'm okay with that. If we put out a call for help with specific pieces, we can attract domain experts to contribute. If others generally think this is a good idea, we can create add a new outline to the repository starting from the spreadsheet above. |
I support the idea of a re-org as well |
I also strongly support the idea of reorganization. I wonder if it would make sense to have a Imaging, Text, and EHR (perhaps in that order?) in a module. EHRs are hot as an area, but it might help to lead off with how folks are handling many of the components of them before jumping into them. I made @manolik's into a markdown version of the table.
I added a brief intro / conclusions section. While I could see the adjustments I proposed, I think they are small when compared to the scale of the reorganization. I like where this is going and strongly support this concept! 👏 |
Yes, greatly agree.
|
I agree. Reorganizing things in this manner looks like a good idea. |
This structure looks good. I am just wondering if sections 6 and 7 would be fit better later on.
|
I do think imaging, text, and EHRs make a lot of sense together. Perhaps what's currently "specialized" could have it's own module just before Module 5. These sections would likely be shorter, but that's ok. Sleep, if I understand correctly, might go into neuroscience there for instance. |
Hi all,
This is such an awesome review, and i'd love to use it as a basis for teaching, but i've had to jump back-and-forth through sections, as the current structure doesn't flow as naturally for a class.
I had some thoughts about potentially restructuring and wanted to get folks' feedback on this.
What do you think?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/guv6eovze8e1s6g/Deep%20Learning%20Review%20Reorganization.xlsx?dl=0
Thanks!
Manolis
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: