google_workflows_workflow_iam_* support

[eraac]

Community Note

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
• If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment. If the issue is assigned to the "modular-magician" user, it is either in the process of being autogenerated, or is planned to be autogenerated soon. If the issue is assigned to a user, that user is claiming responsibility for the issue. If the issue is assigned to "hashibot", a community member has claimed the issue already.

Description

Add support for IAM workflows binding

New or Affected Resource(s)

• google_workflows_workflow_iam_binding
• google_workflows_workflow_iam_member
• google_workflows_workflow_iam_policy

[melinath]

It doesn't look like this resource supports iam

[eraac]

@melinath I think this resource supports IAM. From the console, there is "permissions" tab when you go on one workflow

edit: It's weird, the interface clearly mention the IAM is attached on the workflow, but it's seems the permission workflows.setIamPolicy doesn't exist or even the API method

edit2: ok, the interface is wrong, bind roles on "workflow level" actually add the role on project level...

tab:

grant access button:

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.