m should work with the nearest surround pair even if the cursor is not exactly on a surround character

[archseer]

Leftover from #961

[icholy]

An alternative would be to leave m as-is and add a ]* where * is any character acting as a pair. So ]" would select the next string.

[the-mikedavis]

I would prefer it work at least like m because m can distinguish between around (ma) and inside (mi). Although having control over whether we seek the next ] or previous [ could be useful. I think we should choose one (probably "next") as a default behavior for m when not surrounded though for simplicity of use, even if it's a duplicate keybinding.

[icholy]

What about allowing [ or ] as a prefix for any m commands?