We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Right now, this JSX snippet passes our standards with no warnings:
const IconCheck = () => { return ( <SVG xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="30" height="23" viewBox="0 0 30 23" fill="none"> <Path d="M27.586 0L9.52803 18.058L2.41401 10.9439L0 13.358L9.52803 22.886L30 2.41401L27.586 0Z" fill="#48277F" /> </SVG> ); };
But this as well:
My proposal is to use one of them instead of both possibilities and I think that the second one is more clear. It takes just 3 lines to fix:
... "react/jsx-wrap-multilines": [ "error",{ "declaration": "parens-new-line", "assignment": "parens-new-line", "return": "parens-new-line" }] ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I vote for the second one
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Right now, this JSX snippet passes our standards with no warnings:
But this as well:
My proposal is to use one of them instead of both possibilities and I think that the second one is more clear. It takes just 3 lines to fix:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: