You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Receiving duplicates by email (instead of into your repository) Prefer to receive duplicates into repository
Proposed duplicate filter options - are they useful? what alternatives would you prefer? 3. is our preferred option
Proposed rank - Do you agree with the suggested ranking? How would you rank the metadata fields differently?
Journal identifier (e.g. ISSN) = high for us
Article type (e.g research, review) = high for us Article language: wouldn't say this is 'invariably' English. Our researchers do publish in Italian, Spanish, and that's worth recording in the metadata
Does the checkbox alternative better meet your needs or would the filter option drop-down list be sufficient? the filter option drop-down list is sufficient thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Receiving duplicates by email (instead of into your repository)
Prefer to receive duplicates into repository
Proposed duplicate filter options - are they useful? what alternatives would you prefer?
3. is our preferred option
Proposed rank - Do you agree with the suggested ranking? How would you rank the metadata fields differently?
Journal identifier (e.g. ISSN) = high for us
Article type (e.g research, review) = high for us
Article language: wouldn't say this is 'invariably' English. Our researchers do publish in Italian, Spanish, and that's worth recording in the metadata
Does the checkbox alternative better meet your needs or would the filter option drop-down list be sufficient?
the filter option drop-down list is sufficient thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: