Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Update librdkafka to 2.3.0 #322

Closed
3 tasks done
mensfeld opened this issue Oct 31, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #349
Closed
3 tasks done

Update librdkafka to 2.3.0 #322

mensfeld opened this issue Oct 31, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #349
Assignees
Labels
librdkafka Label for reports / issues related to C librdkafka

Comments

@mensfeld
Copy link
Member

mensfeld commented Oct 31, 2023

Lets give it some time as few times some bugs were reported right after the releases.

Plan:

  • rdkafka-ruby specs pass
  • waterdrop specs pass
  • karafka specs pass
@mensfeld mensfeld added the librdkafka Label for reports / issues related to C librdkafka label Oct 31, 2023
@mensfeld mensfeld self-assigned this Oct 31, 2023
@samsm
Copy link

samsm commented Nov 16, 2023

Hello!

Appreciate the caution, in my organization we were bitten by consumption issues in librdkafka 2.1.0.

Will offer though that Confluent is recommending 2.3.0 in reaction to this issue: OffsetForLeaderEpoch loop of failed requests with multiple leader changes

The symptom of this bug is that a consumer will stop reading a rebalanced partition, indefinitely, even if no other consumer picks it up.

@mensfeld
Copy link
Member Author

@samsm hey. Thank you for your insights. karafka-rdkafka already got 2.3.0 approved (ref karafka#43) and all integrations in karafka pass with 2.3.0.

I will release 0.14 with 2.2.0 and will then release 0.15 with backport later.

@samsm
Copy link

samsm commented Nov 16, 2023

Thanks! Appreciate it

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
librdkafka Label for reports / issues related to C librdkafka
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants