We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Like Spin, it's better to output the results with JSON format.
Because JSON has more portability. Users can pass the marco results to jq to do some transformation, analytics, etc.
marco
jq
Spin outputs the result with the logs included. And it does not support org-wide {application, pipeline} listing feature.
I would like to support this on marco.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
KeisukeYamashita
No branches or pull requests
What
Like Spin, it's better to output the results with JSON format.
Why
Because JSON has more portability. Users can pass the
marco
results tojq
to do some transformation, analytics, etc.Why not use Spin
Spin outputs the result with the logs included.
And it does not support org-wide {application, pipeline} listing feature.
I would like to support this on
marco
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: