Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

MVP support for arbitrary resizing a StatefulSet (investigate if feasible) #3279

Open
mimowo opened this issue Oct 21, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #3520
Open

MVP support for arbitrary resizing a StatefulSet (investigate if feasible) #3279

mimowo opened this issue Oct 21, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #3520
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.

Comments

@mimowo
Copy link
Contributor

mimowo commented Oct 21, 2024

What would you like to be added:

Investigate if we can achieve resizing of a stateful set based on PodGroups.

In the MVP approach it is ok to recreate the entire PodGroup.

This is a follow up to #2717.

Long-term we may want to support smooth resizes, but it probably will require #77.

Why is this needed:

To support use-cases for resizing StatefulSets.

@mimowo mimowo added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Oct 21, 2024
@mimowo
Copy link
Contributor Author

mimowo commented Oct 21, 2024

@mbobrovskyi
Copy link
Contributor

/assign

@mimowo
Copy link
Contributor Author

mimowo commented Nov 15, 2024

The very MVP of scaling-down and up via 0 is covered already with #3487. Keeping this open to investigate arbitrary scaling x->y, where xy.

@mimowo
Copy link
Contributor Author

mimowo commented Nov 15, 2024

/retitle MVP support for arbitrary resizing a StatefulSet (investigate if feasible)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title MVP support for resizing a StatefulSet (investigate if feasible) MVP support for arbitrary resizing a StatefulSet (investigate if feasible) Nov 15, 2024
@mbobrovskyi
Copy link
Contributor

/assign

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants