You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As @adf-ncgr pointed out in issue #161, the score and threshold alignment parameters need to be adjusted relative to the size of the query/result tracks. For users not familiar with the nuances of the various parameters, the adjustment or even the need for it may not be apparent. The parameter should be revised such that the quality of the alignments is invariant relative to the size of the query/result tracks. Not sure how exactly this should be done - perhaps by moving to a percent matched/mismatched/indels tolerated approach?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As @adf-ncgr pointed out in issue #161, the score and threshold alignment parameters need to be adjusted relative to the size of the query/result tracks. For users not familiar with the nuances of the various parameters, the adjustment or even the need for it may not be apparent. The parameter should be revised such that the quality of the alignments is invariant relative to the size of the query/result tracks. Not sure how exactly this should be done - perhaps by moving to a percent matched/mismatched/indels tolerated approach?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: