Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Poe trade search differs from poe sniper search. #78

Open
jstevens45 opened this issue Nov 30, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Poe trade search differs from poe sniper search. #78

jstevens45 opened this issue Nov 30, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@jstevens45
Copy link

jstevens45 commented Nov 30, 2017

When setting up a filter for any ring with 50-100 life and 60-70 total elemental resistance I'm getting no hits from the tool according to what it's gathering from poetrade. When I click the poetrade link it does indeed show no listings. I then click show search from which then shows I'm searching for any item with 50-100 life explicit and pseudo 60-70 total elemental resists, which is almost correct. If I then press search again I get results. Why is the search name on poetrade different than the one I get when I click "Show search form" and then "Search" without changing anything? I think something is broken with the filter and poetrade interaction.

screen shot 2017-11-30 at 1 59 04 pm
screen shot 2017-11-30 at 1 59 24 pm
Above is your tool's poe.trade search key, which generated zero results.

After clicking show search form.
screen shot 2017-11-30 at 1 59 36 pm

Clicking search without editing anything. Show's tons of results, but isn't limited to rings as the search params suggest above.
screen shot 2017-11-30 at 1 59 49 pm

@licoffe
Copy link
Owner

licoffe commented Dec 1, 2017

Yeah, somehow it's different because the item type option is not selected properly in the poe.trade form.

@licoffe licoffe self-assigned this Dec 1, 2017
@licoffe licoffe added the bug label Dec 1, 2017
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants