You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Fuzzy finders such as sk, peco and fzy offer similar functionality to that of fzf, even their command-line arguments mostly coincide with that of fzf. (For example, here are some commands that work exactly the same among all of these fuzzyfinders.) Other than -ansi and -d, which is only supported by sk, those used in fzf-tab-completion seem to be supported by all other mentioned fuzzy finders.
Regarding sk, the value of _FZF_COMPLETION_SEP=$'\x7f' is not interpreted correctly (and the recent change to $\x01 suppresses all output) , but say _FZF_COMPLETION_SEP=$'\x20' at least does not produce unknown characters.
Perhaps it is not difficult after to all to adapt it to other fuzzy finders, at least sk, which comes closest to fzf?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
doesn't sound like a bad idea
I don't use any of the other fuzzy finders, so I don't personally have any interest in adding support, but I won't say no to a PR if someone else does.
With the separator, it should be something that doesn't print out or the fzf UI will be messed up, so 0x20 won't work.
Fuzzy finders such as
sk
,peco
andfzy
offer similar functionality to that offzf
, even their command-line arguments mostly coincide with that offzf
. (For example, here are some commands that work exactly the same among all of these fuzzyfinders.) Other than-ansi
and-d
, which is only supported bysk
, those used infzf-tab-completion
seem to be supported by all other mentioned fuzzy finders.Regarding
sk
, the value of_FZF_COMPLETION_SEP=$'\x7f'
is not interpreted correctly (and the recent change to$\x01
suppresses all output) , but say_FZF_COMPLETION_SEP=$'\x20'
at least does not produce unknown characters.Perhaps it is not difficult after to all to adapt it to other fuzzy finders, at least
sk
, which comes closest tofzf
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: