Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Are Kuma groups coercible to “or” logic? #3647

Closed
1 task done
brunialti opened this issue Aug 26, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed
1 task done

Are Kuma groups coercible to “or” logic? #3647

brunialti opened this issue Aug 26, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
feature-request Request for new features to be added

Comments

@brunialti
Copy link

⚠️ Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before.

  • I checked and didn't find similar feature request

🏷️ Feature Request Type

Other

🔖 Feature description

The Kuma monitoring groups are nice if you want be sure a set of services/devices are up having an “at glance” status overview. That is any member of a kuma group is "and"ed in order to have the group status.
What about "or"ing kuma groups? is it possible? I would like to use them for presence detection, grouping all ips (pc, mobile, …) used by family members: if at least one is active that member is at home.
Is it possible? How to do it?

✔️ Solution

The group status should have 2 options: or | and.
The and option is as groups are working now.
The or options let a group be up when at leat one of the member is up

❓ Alternatives

No response

📝 Additional Context

No response

@brunialti brunialti added the feature-request Request for new features to be added label Aug 26, 2023
@CommanderStorm
Copy link
Collaborator

I think this is a duplicate of #3387
If you agree, could you please close this Issue, as duplicates only create immortal zombies and are really hard to issue-manage?
If not, what makes this issue unique enough to require an additional issue? (Could this be integrated into the issue linked above?) ^^

@CommanderStorm
Copy link
Collaborator

The and option is as groups are working now

Not quite true.
Please see #3629 (comment)

@brunialti
Copy link
Author

Duplicate request

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
feature-request Request for new features to be added
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants